Two pieces of writing on productivity. One human. One generated.
The same report shape Detecto returns to a logged-in reviewer. A human-written essay submitted to an opinion section, and an AI-generated post submitted to a business section, both about productivity. Read them with the signals open.
The same Detecto report, on two passages on the same subject.
No vendor name appears in either report, by design and per privacy policy.
- Average perplexitySurprise per token relative to a base language model.74.2
- BurstinessVariance in sentence-level perplexity across the passage.0.81
- Idiom densityIdiomatic constructions and unconventional phrasing.6.4 / 1k
- Lexical diversityType-token ratio across the passage.0.62 TTR
- Sentence-length variance14.8
I didn’t expect to miss the commute. For eleven years I complained about that train, and then one Tuesday it was gone, and so was the part of the day that was neither work nor home. The first month felt like a snow day that wouldn’t end. By the third, my kitchen table had a permanent laptop dent and I was taking calls in the closet, because it was the only quiet room in the house. Nobody warns you how loud the silence gets. No one drifts past your desk. No one overhears the half-formed idea you say out loud by accident and tells you it’s actually good. I’m more productive now, mostly, the afternoons are finally mine. But I shipped two things this quarter I’m proud of and can’t name a single hallway conversation that led to either one. Maybe that’s the trade. You get the deep hours back and hand over the accidental ones: the elevator, the burnt break-room coffee, the small talk that somehow added up to knowing people. I still don’t miss the train. I just didn’t realize it had been carrying something I’d eventually want back.
Scored Likely human. Burstiness and perplexity sit well above the AI range, idiom density is high, and sentence length swings hard from line to line, all consistent with unprompted human writing. A reviewer can clear this with confidence.
- Average perplexitySurprise per token relative to a base language model.74.2
- BurstinessVariance in sentence-level perplexity across the passage.0.81
- Idiom densityIdiomatic constructions and unconventional phrasing.6.4 / 1k
- Lexical diversityType-token ratio across the passage.0.62 TTR
- Sentence-length variance14.8
- Confidence varianceDetector’s own variance across resampled detection passes.0.04
- Average perplexitySurprise per token relative to a base language model.18.3
- BurstinessVariance in sentence-level perplexity across the passage.0.21
- Connector frequency"First", "Second", "Ultimately", "In today’s world" and similar.11.2 / 1k
- Sentence-length variance3.4
- Lexical diversity0.41 TTR
In today’s rapidly evolving world, remote work has become an increasingly important topic for businesses and employees alike. First and foremost, remote work offers a wide range of benefits, including increased flexibility, reduced commuting time, and improved work-life balance. Moreover, numerous studies have shown that remote employees can be just as productive, if not more productive, than their in-office counterparts. However, it is important to consider the potential challenges, such as feelings of isolation, communication barriers, and the difficulty of separating work from personal life. Ultimately, the success of remote work depends on a variety of factors, including company culture, available technology, and individual preferences. In conclusion, while remote work presents both advantages and disadvantages, it is clear that it will continue to play a significant role in the future of work.
Scored Likely AI-generated. Low perplexity, low burstiness, and a high connector frequency (“First”, “Moreover”, “Ultimately”) match templated model output, and the “In today’s world” opener is a common tell. Strong, consistent signal, but treat it as a reason to talk to the author, not as proof.
- Average perplexitySurprise per token relative to a base language model.18.3
- BurstinessVariance in sentence-level perplexity across the passage.0.21
- Connector frequency"First", "Second", "Ultimately", "In today’s world" and similar.11.2 / 1k
- Sentence-length variance3.4
- Lexical diversity0.41 TTR
- Confidence varianceDetector’s own variance across resampled detection passes.0.05
What the reviewer sees in their dashboard.
Notes pane, share toggle, export to PDF. Reports save privately to your dashboard, shared only when you choose.
A pane attached to every scan. Author of the note and timestamp logged.
Sign up to use itGenerates a detec.to share link when the reviewer opts in. Default is private.
Sign up to use itOne-click export of the full report (score, signals, highlights) for the editorial folder.
Sign up to use itHonest limitations
A detection score is probabilistic, not proof. Treat the report as evidence to discuss, not a verdict to publish.
- These two passages are well-separated in score because they are designed examples. Real submissions land all over the band.
- The score is a probability, not a verdict. Treat it as evidence to discuss.
- A 78% AI score is the start of a conversation. Don’t auto-reject.
- Confidence widens for short input.
- See /accuracy-and-limitations and /false-positives for the full posture.
Run a scan. Read the signals. Decide.
Sign-in optional for the demo. Demo scans aren't saved.