For editors reviewing freelance submissions
Score, signals, and a notes pane you can attach to a decision.
You decide what runs under the masthead. Detecto reads a freelance draft and returns an AI-likelihood with the signals behind it, so the desk can weigh a submission on evidence, not a hunch, before it’s scheduled. The report saves privately to your account; share it only when a conversation with the contributor calls for it.
Built for the people who review other people’s content
- Editors at independent magazines
- University writing centers
- Newsroom verification desks
- PR review teams
- Content QA leads at agencies
What editors typically scan with Detecto.
- Pitch decks and final drafts from freelancers and contributors
- Long-form essays and analysis pieces
- Op-eds and reader submissions
- Translated copy from non-staff translators
The failure modes Detecto is built to surface.
- A contributor passes off AI-drafted copy as original reporting
- A lightly edited AI draft slips through on deadline
- Machine-generated text hides inside translated copy
- A trusted byline quietly starts leaning on a model
The workflow, end to end.
Five steps. None of them is automated.
- 01
Paste the draft, or upload the PDF / DOCX export.
- 02
Read the score and confidence band before you read for line edits.
- 03
Open the highlighted view to see which passages moved the score.
- 04
Attach a note recording what you decided and why.
- 05
Share the report with the contributor only if the conversation needs it.
Evidence that goes in the file.
A 0–100 AI-likelihood with a High / Medium / Low confidence band.
Sentence-level highlighting that points to the passages in question.
A timestamped, account-scoped record you can attach to a run-or-kill decision.
What not to do with AI detection
The same posture every Detecto reviewer reads. The score is evidence, not a verdict.
- Don’t treat a high score as proof, it’s a likelihood, not a confession.
- Don’t spike a piece on the number alone; pair it with your read and a conversation.
- Don’t paste an unpublished draft into tools you don’t control to “double-check.”
- Don’t quote the percentage at a writer as if it settles the question.
Whatever shape the submission arrives in.
Questions editors ask.
If this fits, these probably do too.
A probability and a paragraph of evidence, never a unilateral verdict.
Read the workflowFor publishersPer-scene timeline and metadata-integrity checks on the file before it lands in the article.
Read the workflowFor pr teamsThe score lands before the client sees the deliverable.
Read the workflowBuilt around how editors actually review.
Sign up free. Private by default. Vendor names never reach the browser.